[17:04:51] NASSP Logging has been started by thewonderidiot [17:11:43] hello again [17:14:26] @indy91 in your opinion do you think the apollo 10 rendezvous is much different from apollo 7? [17:15:39] thewonderidiot, yeah, every 10 calculations or so it randomly had a -nan(ind) [17:16:13] acos(dotp(unit(R), unit(R_J))) [17:16:24] with R and R_J being exactly identical on the first timestep [17:16:29] iteration* [17:16:36] yeah that is super annoying [17:16:44] well, a propagated state vector with a dt of 0 [17:16:49] on the first iteration [17:17:12] so a lot of calculations going on and the output being not simply set identical to the input [17:17:24] hence the random issue, because floating point [17:18:10] astronauthen96__, I'd say the inputs and procedures of the Apollo 10 rendezvous are easier than on Apollo 7 [17:18:29] the major advantage is, the rendezvous radar takes marks automatically [17:18:51] so the very time consuming sextant marks, which are also not easy to get super precise, doesn't have to be done [17:19:37] yeah, i don't think i will get it right for my first attempt [17:19:45] on the other hand, you have to use P32, P33 and P34. On Apollo 7 it was just P34 for TPI. So a few more onboard programs to learn. [17:20:49] i think those are for csi, cdh and tpi [17:21:22] correct [17:21:35] i just remembered from those maneuver pads in the flight plan [17:21:40] the programs for CSI and CDH weren't added to the CMC until Apollo 10 [17:21:54] not even Apollo 9 had them [17:22:24] which would have been useful to rescue the LM [17:22:37] had to rely more on ground calculated maneuvers I guess [17:23:06] is that what you are working on now for the mcc's [17:23:34] yeah, for the mission control feature the ground calculated rendezvous maneuvers are basically complete [17:24:09] in the timeline I am just after the insertion burn. [17:24:21] so from here on the rendezvous is all onboard calculated [17:24:34] with the dsky? [17:24:47] yes [17:24:53] although there are backup charts [17:24:55] and the AGS